GYNENDRA PANDEY G PANDEY Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) 2/ 09.5.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State as also learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2, who has appeared through vakalatnama.

(2.) PETITIONERS have challenged the order dated 06.10.2010 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No. 2, Bokaro, in S.T No. 12 of 2007, arising out of B.S.City (Sector-XII) P.S Case No. 197 of 2006 corresponding to G.R No. 774 of 2006, whereby, in exercise of power under Section 319 of the Cr.P.C, the petitioners have been summoned to face the trial along-with other co-accused facing the trial.

(3.) FROM perusal of the evidence of the witnesses, it is apparent that the witnesses have supported the prosecution case against these petitioners also and they have stated in their examination-In-chief that these petitioners also had made the -2- demand of dowry and that deceased was subjected to cruelty and torture at her matrimonial home for non-fulfillment of the demand. In the impugned order, the Court below has also detailed the statements of the witnesses to show that the witnesses have supported the case against the petitioners also.