MANOJ KUMAR GOSWAMI Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State, as also learned counsel for the private opposite parties who have appeared through Advocate upon notice.

(2.) THE petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 13.1.2011 passed in M.P Case No. 97 of 2008, whereby, the petitioner has been directed to make the payment of Rs.2,000/- per month as maintenance to his deserted wife and Rs.1,000/- per month as maintenance to his minor daughter, who is living with her mother, and the maintenance has been ordered to be paid from the date of filing of the petition.

(3.) IT is the submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that due to said restriction imposed upon him, the petitioner was also deprived of his job for a considerable period. However, learned counsel submits that in the year 2011, the petitioner has again got his job back. In view of the fact that due to the conditions imposed by this Court, the petitioner was deprived of his job for a considerable period, during which, he had no earning, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the maintenance be ordered to be paid from the date of order and the impugned order be modified at least to that extent.