DURGA ORAON Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) IT will be appropriate to first mention here that the counsel for the respondent no.17 submitted that, against the respondent no.17 no investigation is being conducted by the C.B.I. and that is because of the reason that Income Tax Department or State Vigilance Department did not find anything against the respondent no.17.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the C.B.I. submitted that the C.B.I. may undertake only those cases, which have been assigned to the C.B.I. by specific order either by the Central Government or by the Court's order and at this stage only two cases have been referred to the C.B.I. for which they are proceeding and the challan has been filed in those two cases. Learned counsel for the C.B.I. also submitted the progress report, which we are taking on record. However, that progress report will be considered on next date.