(1.) HEARD the parties.
(2.) THIS application is directed against the order dated 19.4.2011 passed by the then Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in Complaint Case No. 1470 of 2010, whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offences under Sections 467, 468, 469, 471, 420 and 120B of Indian Penal Code has been taken against the petitioners.
(3.) MR . Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, submits that there has been nothing on the record to show that Smt. Shakti Sharma is the daughter of late Sheo Kumar Sharma and late Shakuntala Sharma, whereas Kailash Kumar Sharma happened to be the brother of Sheo Kumar Sharma and he on the death of Sheo Kumar Sharma and his wife inherited the property and sold it to petitioner no.1 -Chandra Kala Devi for a consideration. On purchasing the house, petitioner no. 1 came to rightful possession of the same and let out the said house on rent to opposite party no. 2 -complainant and one Krishna Kumar Singh who paid the rent but thereafter stopped making payment of the rent.