NEELAM SINHA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the complainant.

(2.) BOTH these applications have been filed for quashing of the entire criminal proceeding of C.P.Case no.1827 of 2011 including the order dated 14.10.2011 whereby and whereunder cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471, 120(B) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code has been taken against the petitioners.

(3.) AS against that, learned counsel appearing for the complainant submits that earlier on an application of Chandi Prasad Mahto, a genealogical table was prepared on the basis of the said report submitted by the petitioner (Dubai Murmu) wherein Bhusia Mahatain was shown to have died leaving behind one daughter whereas in the second report, though it has been prepared by the Circle Officer but that report had been prepared on the basis of genealogical table over which the petitioner (Neelam Sinha) has also put his signature wherein it has been shown that Budhu Mahto died leaving behind Bhusia Mahatain and Domni Mahatain and this report was prepared in connivance with other accused person so that other accused person may lay claim over the land of the complainant.