GOPAL BAURI Vs. PRESIDING OFFICER, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 22.02.2002 passed in L.C. Case No. 9 of 2000 by the Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal No. 1 at Dhanbad (Respondent No. 1) whereby the case was disposed of on the ground that the appellant / applicant is not interested and does not want to pursue the case as no one was appearing on behalf of the applicant and no steps whatsoever has been taken in the said case before the learned court.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner further submits that there was no necessity of any adjudication by the Tribunal for computation of the amount due to the workman and he could straightaway approach the Industrial Tribunal under section 33 -C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for realization of his dues which could be enforced in view of section 33 -C(4) only by the concerned Government upon determination by the Industrial Tribunal.