GOPAL KRISHNA Vs. PRITI BALA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite party.

(2.) THIS revision petition has been filed by the petitioner, who is husband of the opposite party, challenging the order dated 31.3.2010 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Garhwa, in Misc. Case no. 41 of 2008, whereby the Court below has allowed the maintenance of Rs. 5,000/ -per month in favour of opposite party wife.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the Court below failed to take into consideration that the petitioner has not having such income, so as to pay the maintenance of Rs. 5,000/ -per month to the claimant wife. It has been submitted that evidence was brought on record to show that wife of the petitioner was mentally ill and learned counsel for the petitioner submitted during argument that Tyre Agency was closed in the year 2006 itself.