UPENDRA KUMAR THAKUR Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) COUNSEL for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are challenging the order dated 3rd July, 2009, at Annexure 9 to the memo of the petition whereby the claim of the petitioners for regularisation in the services has been brushed aside. It is further submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that some similarly situated persons have moved the High Court by filing W.P.(S) No. 3320 of 2009 against the aforesaid order dated 3rd July. 2009 passed by the Dy. Commissioner, Palamau and vide order dated 30th November. 2010 (Annexure 19 to the rejoinder affidavit filed by the petitioners) in the said writ petition, this Court has been pleased to quash and set aside the order dated 3rd July, 2009 and the matter was remanded to the Dy. Commissioner, Palamau for a fresh decision in the light of the observation made in the said judgment.

(2.) IT has been further submitted by counsel for the petitioners that the matter was remanded to the respondents in the light of the order dated 30th November, 2010 passed in W.P.(S) 3320 of 2009 and the petitioners of the said writ petition who are similarly situated have been regularised in the services vide order dated 15th December, 2010 passed by the Dy. Commissioner, Palamau. 2006 (4) SCC 1, especially paragraph 53 of the said decision, some juniors to the petitioner have been given promotion.

(3.) AFTER the decision is taken in the manner aforesaid, the benefit, if any, will be extended to the petitioners within a further period of four weeks.