UMESH CHANDRA SINGH Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE petitioner being aggrieved by the order dated 24th July, 2003 (Annexure3) passed by the respondent No. 6 in Certificate Case No. 40 of 2001, has preferred this writ application stating that despite his detailed objection made under Section 9 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demands Recovery Act, 1914, now adopted by the State of Jharkhand, and without determining the liability of petitioner under Section 10 of the Act of 1914, the Certificate Officer has directed the petitioner to deposit the entire certificate amount. The petitioner is also aggrieved by the distress warrant issued and seeks quashing of the entire certificate proceedings in Certificate Case No. 40 of 2001 pending before the Certificate Officer -cum -Managing Director Sinqhbhum District Central Cooperative Bank Limited Chaibasa (respondent No.6).

(3.) COUNSEL for the respondent No.6 on the other hand submits that the petitioner was put in jail in execution of the distress warrant and his objection has already been rejected in the year 2003.