ANJANI KUMAR SRIVASTAVA Vs. MINERAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present interlocutory application has been preferred for substitution of the original petitioner, namely, Bishwanath Prasad as he expired on 19th February, 2011 and, therefore, it is prayed that name of the applicant Sri Anjani Kumar Srivastava is permitted to be joined as substituted petitioner. He is the brother of the original petitioner. THE wife of the original petitioner has also expired and original petitioner has no issue.

(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the respondents, who has submitted that they have no much objection, if such a direction is given to respondent no. 2 to treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the claim of the petitioner, by passing a detailed speaking order, in accordance with law and within stipulated time, as given by this Court.

(3.) IN view of the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of.