SHIVNANDAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Tapen Sen, J.

(2.) HEARD Mr. Kishor Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Suresh Kumar learned J.C. to AAG.

(3.) PURSUANT to the aforementioned order, the Petitioner gave his Joining on 22.3.2000 whereafter he was allowed to join but he was not paid his salary. Consequently he again moved CWJC No. 1943 of 2000 (R) which was again disposed off on 10.7.2000 with a direction to file a representation and the concerned respondent was in turn directed to consider and dispose it off by passing a reasoned order within one month. Thereafter on 14.9.2000, the Deputy, Commissioner, Palamau passed the impugned order as contained at Annexure -5 and the petitioner is aggrieved by Clause 1 thereof. Clause 1 of the impugned order which states that during the period spent in Jail, i.e., 14.9.1994 to 30.6.1996, the petitioner would get 50% of his salary for the first 12 months and thereafter from the 13th month onwards, he would get 75% of the dearness allowance. The period spent in Jail would be treated to be Earned Leave and this would be counted in his service.