ANIL KUMAR Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN this case, the petitioner has prayed for a declaration that he is entitled to hold the post of Typist/Assistant in the Collectorate, having been appointed on compassionate ground on the death of his father, with further prayer to direct the, respondents to give him seniority from the date of his original appointment, made vide letter dated 21st March, 1990. Further declaration has also been sought for that the Officer Order dated 21st September, 1997 is valid and enforceable to the extent in placing the petitioners service in the Collectorate.

(2.) ACCORDING to the petitioner, his father was Head Assistant -cum -Accountant in the Collectorate at Lohardagga and died in harness on 3rd March, 1989. The petitioner was appointed on compassionate ground on the post of Typist/Assistant on 21st March, 1990. However, he was deputed in the District Rural Development Agency (D.R.D.A. for short) against a temporary and non -pensionary post. In this background, the petitioner represented before the Deputy Commissioner on 21st August, 1996 for his adjustment to the Collectorate cadre. Thereafter, being successful in interview, petitioners cadre was changed to that of Collectorate Cadre, vide order dated 29th January, 1997 i.e. from the date of his joining in the Collectorate Cadre. The decision aforesaid was approved by the Compassionate Appointment Committee in its meeting, proceeding of which was circulated by the Deputy Commissioner, Lohardagga, vide Memo No. 586 dated 27th June, 1997. Thereafter, such proceeding was confirmed/approved vide letter dated 17th July, 1997.

(3.) THE pleading as made in the writ petition is misconceived being not in/consonance to the annexures attached. It will be evident that the petitioner was appointed on compassionate ground to the post of Clerk (Assistant) in D.R.D.A., Lohardagga, vide Memo No. 199 dated 21st March/1990 issued by the Managing Director, D.R.D.A., Lohardagga. He was hot appointed in the Collectorate. Thus, the petitioners claim that he was appointed in the Collectorate and his service was placed in D.R.D.A. is misconceived. The second appointment seems to have been made in the Collectorate, Lohardagga again on compassionate ground by change of the cadre, vide Memo No. 91 dated 21st January, 1997, though it was not permissible.