AJAY KUMAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ALL the above three WP (Cr) writ petitions have been heard together as the common questions are involved for consideration and are being disposed of by this common order.

(2.) IT is alleged that the petitioners have been remanded in judicial custody without taking cognizance though charge sheet have been submitted in the case. The first information report was lodged under section 7/13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

(3.) IT is also submitted that it has been consistently held by the Division Bench that the remand of the accused without taking cognizance is not permissible under the law.