PANKAJ KUMAR HARLALKA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE grievance of the writ petitioner in the instant case is that on account of an endorsement dated 19.3.2002 made by the District Sub -Registrar, Ranchi the sale deed in question has not been registered and, therefore, prayer has been made inter alia in this writ application for issuance of an appropriate direction commanding upon the respondent No. 3 (District Sub -Registrar, Ranchi) to register the sale deed as according to the petitioner, the same complies with all the requirements of the Registration Act, 1908.

(2.) ALTHOUGH this case is fully covered by a Judgment delivered by this Court earlier in the case of Ritu Singh and Ors. v. State of Jharkhand and Ors., passed on 28.2.2002 in W.P. (C) No. 5421/2001 : reported in 2002 (1) JCR 397 (Jhr), yet it would be necessary to briefly state the facts involved herein.

(3.) ACCORDING to writ petitioner, as has been stated in paragraphs 5 to 7, the sale deed complies with all the necessary procedures and formalities required under the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908.