MADHUR PRASAD SINHA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr. S.B. Gadodia, learned Sr. Advocate appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Azeemuddin, who states that he is J.C. to G.P. I.

(2.) THE grievance of the petitioner is that although he had filed specific details with regard to his illness in his representation as contained at Annexure -5/1 which appears to have been forwarded by the Joint Director, Labour, Employment and Training, Ranchi on 25.1.2002, the same has been rejected in a most mechanical manner vide Annexure -6 (at page 43 to the writ petition) without giving any reason and by a stroke of the pen, the authorities concerned have rejected the representation of the persons who have been transferred by reason of the impugned order including the representation of the petitioner.

(3.) THE petitioner has also stated that he went to Vellore ultimately but due to exorbitant costs, he had to come back within a short period of fifteen days in February, 2001, whereafter according to him, he is continuing to be under the treatment of a Neurologist, namely, Dr. Mahapatra at Dhanbad.