CHITRANJAN PRASAD VERMA Vs. STATE OF BIHAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr. V.P. Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner. No body appears on behalf of the respondents.

(2.) MR . Vijay Pratap Singh learned counsel for the petitioner has produced for the perusal of this Court two Judgments delivered by the then Ranchi Bench of the Patna High Court delivered in the cases of Sant Kumar Sinha and Alakh Niranjan being, CWJC, Nos. 3068/1994 (R) and 3057/1994 (R). In those writ applications, the petitioners therein had initially challenged the order dated 07.06.1994 and 29.09.1994 and other orders by reason whereof the orders of promotion granted to 41 persons working on the post of Block Extension Educator were ordered to be cancelled and show cause notices were directed to be issued respectively.

(3.) IN the instant case, the petitioner Chitranjan Prasad Verma was also noticed vide Annexure 1/1 appended to the supplementary affidavit and the order of cancellation of their promotion was communicated by annexure 7, i.e. order dated 29.9.1994, Mr. V.P. Singh states that this case is squarely covered by the Judgments delivered in the aforementioned cases and submits that those petitioners having succeeded in the above mentioned writ applications, there is no reason why this petitioner should be deprived of the benefits of the said Judgment. There appears to be substance and force in what Mr. V.P. Singh has submitted. If what he has, therefore, submitted is factually correct, then there is no reason why the petitioner should also not be granted similar relief as has been granted to the petitioners of the aforementioned writ applications.