(1.) THE petitioner has challenged the order contained in Memo No. 52 dated 11th February, 2002 whereby and whereunder it has been ordered to retire the petitioner w.e.f. 31st January, 2002 having completed 40 years of service.
(2.) ADMITTEDLY , no rule/guide line has been prescribed by the State for superannuation of a Government employee on completion of 40 years of service. The age of superannuation has been prescribed under Rule 73 of the Bihar Service Code in terms of which a person stands retired on attaining 58 years of age. There is nothing on the record to suggest that any rule or guide line was in vogue prescribing minimum age of 18 years when the petitioner was appointed on 1st February, 1962.
(3.) IN spite of time allowed to the respondents, no counter affidavit has been filed till date. In fact the case was argued on the basis of the provisions of law as referred above.