CENTRAL UNIVERSITY OF JHARKHAND Vs. ISWAR CHAND BIDYASAGAR

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The matter has been heard through video conferencing with the consent of learned counsel for the parties. They have no complaint about any audio and visual quality.

(2.) The brief facts of the case which required to be enumerated reads as hereunder:-

(3.) The writ petitioner has taken a ground that entire departmental proceeding is nothing but suffers from malice and bias. Since the order of suspension visits the employee with serious civil consequences and loss of reputation and prestige and monetary loss and hence, cannot be passed without following the principle of natural justice and without application of mind. It has further been agitated before the learned Single Judge that the authority who has passed the order of suspension is having no jurisdiction to issue such order under the provision of Statute 25(1) of the Central Universities Act, 2009.