NAWAL KUMAR YADAV Vs. SONAMUNI MARANDI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The matter has been heard through video conferencing with the consent of learned counsel for the parties. They have no complaint about any audio and visual connectivity.

(2.) The brief facts of the case as per the pleading made in the writ petition is that:-

(3.) Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted in his defence by referring to the statement made in the written statement that there is no specific admission on his part about causing of accident by dumper bearing registration no. HR 26-6228.