DINESH KUMAR RAJAK Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The matter has been heard with the consent of learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing. There is no complaint about any audio and visual quality.

(2.) The brief facts of the case required to be referred herein read as hereunder:-

(3.) Mr. Rahul Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner has submitted that rejection of the claim of the writ petitioner is totally on frivolous ground as if the case of the writ petitioner would have been considered for the year 2005, the year on which the application for appointment on compassionate ground was filed, the matter would have been different but it is the slackness on the part of the respondent authorities in not considering the application in the year 2005 rather it has been considered in the Month of March, 2008 and therefore, the impugned decision of the authority cannot be said to be justified which fact has not been considered by the learned Single Judge.