RASHMI KUMARI Vs. TAPAS KUMAR ROY

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WHEN the matter is called out, learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent. Neither the matter is mentioned nor did anybody appear on behalf of the Petitioner.

(2.) LOOKING to the facts and circumstances of the case and also looking to the impugned order passed by the trial court dated 1st July, 2009 in T.M.S. No. 552 of 2007, I see no reason to entertain this writ petition mainly for the following facts and reasons: