AMLESH KUMAR PASWAN Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the revisionist and the learned counsel for the State, in these revisions against acquittal.

(2.) By the order, dated 28th February, 2011, an appeal by the State against the judgment of acquittal in the same matter being Acquittal Appeal No. 7 of 2011, was dismissed with the following order:-

(3.) Considering the fact that neither the post-mortem report nor the injury reports of the witnesses allegedly injured have been brought on record, and also considering the reasons given above and also taking into account the fact that in cases where two views are possible, the appellate or revisional Court does not interfere with judgments of acquittal. We decline to interfere with the revision.