(1.) THE office objection dated 09.05.2011 is dispensed with.
(2.) HEARD learned Counsel for the Appellant on merit of the case.
(3.) THIS fact is not disputed and cannot be disputed, in view of the fact that this fact had come out of the averments made in the court in reply to the Maintenance Application No. 30/2009. If a father can go to that extent, then certainly he cannot be entitled to the custody of the child when custody of the son is already with the mother since long. The appeal of the Appellant is dismissed having no merit.