BISHWANATH MAHATO Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) PRESENT petition has been preferred against an order passed by Additional Sub JudgeII, Bokaro dated 29th of September, 2010 whereby the trial Court has accepted the written statement filed by the original defendant in Title Suit No.6 of 2007.

(2.) HAVING heard the counsel for the petitioners and the State and looking into the copy of the impugned order passed by Additional Sub JudgeII, Bokaro dated 29th September, 2010 in Title Suit No.6 of 2007, I see no reason to entertain this writ petition, moreover, for the reason that the petitioner is an original plaintiff in Title Suit No.6 of 2007, in which with some delay of 135 days written statement was tendered by the original plaintiff and the same was accepted by the trial Court.

(3.) THERE is no substance in the writ petition and the same is hereby dismissed.