RAVINDRA KUMAR Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is seeking compassionate appointment because of death of his father in the year 1999.

(2.) Learned counsel for the respondent State submitted that after such a belated stage, the very purpose of compassionate appointment has been frustrated, by now and he has relied upon the decisions rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, as State of U.P. v. Paras Nath, 1998 2 SCC 412 and Sanjay Kumar v. State of Bihar & ors., 2000 7 SCC 192.

(3.) Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, I see no reason to entertain this writ petition mainly for the following facts and reasons: