PRATYUSH KRISHNA BANERJEE Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and learned Counsel for the State as also learned Counsel for the informant.

(2.) PETITIONER is an accused in a case registered Under Section 406, 420 of the I.P.C. in connection with Doranda P.S. Case No. 36 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 384 of 2011 pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the dispute is only civil in nature, since admittedly the Petitioner has filed T.S. No. 264 of 2010 before filing of this F.I.R. It is further submitted that as per the agreement annexed with the F.I.R it is clear that if the agreement will be canceled account will be verified and advance taken be refunded with interest. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner further submitted that it will appear from the averments made in para 14 and 15 of the Title suit filed by the informant that with the concurrence of the female co -sharer and other co -sharer, Defendant No. 1 to 4, 7 to 11 and 13 to 16 jointly and unanimously decided to sale the suit property to salable buyers, hence there is No. concealment from the co -sharer and there is No. question of cheating the informant. In that view of the matter, Petitioner may be enlarge on bail.