BALIRAM PASWAN Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY the Court. -Learned counsel for the State submits that since the Superintendent of Police Gumla could attend the Court, he is not pressing this interlocutory application.

(2.) SINCE the concerned Superintendent of Police is present in the Court the interlocutory application has become in -fructuous. Hence, I.A.No.1188 of 2011 is dismissed as in -fructuous.

(3.) THE Superintendent of Police, Gumla is present in person. A full and detailed report has been submitted and it has been submitted that during investigation confessional statement was recorded that one Lalku Nayak has received Rs.1,30,000/ - as ransom amount. However the three minor children are yet missing and could not be traced out. However, it is submitted that in the FIR. Gumla P.S. Case No.86 of 2008, it has been alleged that three children have been kidnapped. Ultimately vide Memo No. 609 of 2011. investigation has been closed and thereafter a supplementary charge -sheet has been submitted against accused. Ranthu Singh vide Memo No.638/AP.AH dated 30.4.2011.