ARJUN YADAV Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) I. A. No. 2065 of 2011 An intervention application has been filed on behalf of B. K. Yadav, Proprietor of M/s. B. K. Enterprises vide I. A. No. 2065 of 2011. Intervention application is allowed. Let the applicant be added as Respondent No. 5 in the instant writ petition. W.P. (C) No. 482 of 2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as on behalf of the State. Mr. P. K. Prasad, Sr. Advocate has appeared for the Intervenor and also advanced his arguments.

(2.) THE order impugned in the instant writ petition is Annexure-4 dated 17-1-2011 whereby the Agreement No. 02F2/10-11 was cancelled. THE letter dated 17th January, 2011 is only an information that the agreement on behalf of the petitioner stands cancelled.

(3.) GRIEVANCE of the petitioner is that once his tender was accepted, agreement was executed and he was asked to commence the work and after investment of a huge amount of money, the agreement could not be cancelled, unilaterally without notice or opportunity of hearing, by a letter which has been done in the instant case.