DINESH ORAON Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner has invoked the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashment of the entire criminal proceeding arising out of Sisai (Bharno) P.S. Case No.60 of 2001, corresponding to G.R.No.482 of 2001, pending before the S.D.J.M., Gumla including the order taking cognizance for the offence under Sections

(2.) LEARNED Counsel Mr. Zaid under the instruction of Mr. A.K.Chaturvedi submits that the offence as alleged took place on 13.07.2001 and the case was registered on the same day on 13.07.2001 but the police after investigation submitted charge -sheet much beyond three years i.e. after five years. Accordingly cognizance of the offence was taken on 09.08.2006 for the alleged offence mentioned here -in -before.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel further added that it is nowhere stated in the cognizance order dated 09.08.2006 that learned S.D.J.M., Gumla has exercised his discretion by condoning the delay under Section 473 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a reasoned order, therefore, the cognizance of the offence was barred by jurisdiction and therefore, the entire criminal prosecution of the petitioner may be quashed.