DINESH LOHRA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under sections 302, 307, 387/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of the Arms Act and further Section 17 of the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act and Section 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

(2.) THE counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that earlier the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court twice in B.A No. 8642 of 2009 vide order dated 12th April 2010 and in B.A No. 6073 of 2010 vide order dated 20th August 2010. THE counsel appearing for the petitioner further submits that the another two co-accused namely Sinod Lohra and Deepak Adikhari have been granted bail who are standing on the similar footing with the present petitioner. It is also submitted that the present petitioner is in custody from 04.09.2009 i.e more than one year.

(3.) CONSIDERING the seriousness of the offence and considering the materials which have come in the case diary against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is, hereby, rejected.