NELSON PITTAR Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND,

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the Petitioner, learned Counsel for the opposite party and learned Counsel for the State.

(2.) THE instant revision has been preferred challenging the order dated 17.12.2002 passed by Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Bermo at Tenughat, in Maintenance Case No. 17 of 1997, whereby the court below, has directed the Petitioner, Nelson Pittar to give maintenance of Rs. 800/per month, to his wife opposite party No. 2, Teresa Pal @ Lakshmi and Rs. 500/ - per month each to his daughters opposite party Nos. 3 and 4 namely Mary Peter and Trikal Peter respectively.

(3.) ON the other hand, learned Counsel for the opposite parties has opposed the prayer and submitted that there is no illegality in the impugned order as the Court below has discussed the evidence adduced on behalf of the both the parties and has also given finding on the quantum of maintenance.