DILIP KUMAR Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pathak, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

(2.) THE grievance of the petitioner is that the Joint Commissioner, Transport, F.F.P. Building, H.E.C. , Dhurwa, Ranchi (respondent no. 4) has passed an order on 29th March, 2010 (Annexure 6) to the effect that the petitioner Dilip Kumar alias Dilip Kumar Agarwal has misbehaved with him in his office, using unparliamentary language and thereby created an atmosphere which was derogatory, due to which the Joint Commissioner, Transport was not able to conduct his normal office work in his office on the said date. He, therefore, passed an order that the three persons who were present in his office and tried to misbehave with him should not be allowed to enter in the office. This order has been challenged by the petitioner seeking to quash Office Order contained in Memo No. 442 dated 29th March, 2010 (Annexure 6) passed by the respondent no. 4, as the same has been issued in mala fide exercise of power, directing the respondents, particularly respondents no. 3 and 4, to make proper arrangement of counters for receiving the different kinds of applications, forms, payments and for supplying the certified copies, tax token etc.