BABLU IZHAR Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner is in custody in connection with the case registered under Sections 363/366(A)/372/354/34 IPC.

(2.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; even if the entire allegation is taken as it is, it does not constitute the alleged offences against the petitioner; the only allegation is that the petitioner had arranged railway ticket and the victim had heard the name of the petitioner while the main accused was talking on Mobile; nothing incriminating has been recovered from the petitioner's possession; the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent; the petitioner is in custody since August 2010 without any cogent basis; the petitioner is a local permanent resident and there is no chance of his absconding.