AMAR GUPTA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the learned counsel of the petitioner and the learned counsel of the C.B.I.

(2.) THIS criminal revision application has been filed by the petitioner for setting aside the order dated 1.12.2010 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge-1-cum-Special Judge,C.B.I., Dhanbad, whereby the discharge petition filed by the petitioner is rejected.

(3.) CONSIDERING the submissions of both the parties and considering the materials on record which clearly shows that the tainted money has been recovered from the possession of Amar Gupta who was present at the time of conversation between the complainant and the accused Dilip Kumar Paul, I do not find any reason to interfere with the impugned order. Accordingly, this criminal revision application is rejected.