PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This petition has been filed for seeking the following relief:

(2.) In nutshell the Petitioners are claiming their seniority and continuation of their services from the date when their services have been dispensed with i.e, from 9.2.1998. The Petitioners had been appointed as Dalpatis and thereafter their services were dispensed with. The government, vide order dated 14.11.2004, reappointed the Dalpaties whose services has already been dispensed with by the Government. The Petitioners are claiming to place them in the appropriate place considering their appointment of 1993 from the period of 1998 to 2005, be counted towards their services.

(3.) The learned Counsel for the Respondents has refuted the contention and averred in the counter affidavit that the Petitioners who were appointed in the year 1993 were dispensed with from their services by the order of erstwhile State of Bihar dated 9.2.1998. Thereafter, the Jharkhand Panchayti Raj Act, 2001 was enforced with effect from 10.5.2001 and Gram Raksha Dal Niaymawali, 2002 came into force with effect from 1.6.2002. This Court in L.P.A. No. 533 of 2002, directed that retrenched Dalpaties may be reappointed if the government desires so and also directed to take a decision in this regard. The government has also taken a decision in the year 2004 in which reappointments of Dalpaties were directed to be made by the competent authority and it was also indicated in the Circular that the period spent in services prior to their reappointment as Dalpaties shall not be counted nor any payment shall be made to them for that period. It was further indicated in the G.O. that the financial benefits would accrue to them only from the date of joining of their services after reappointment and their earlier services would not be counted after the new appointment. At the last, the Respondents made a prayer to dismiss the petition.