DIRECTOR, CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF PSYCHIATRY, KANKE, RANCHI Vs. THE CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, PATNA BENCH, PATNA THROUGH ITS VICE CHAIRMAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner.

(2.) ACCORDING to the learned counsel for the petitioner, respondent Nos. 2 and 3 who moved O.A. before the "Central Administrative Tribunal , Patna Bench, Patna as O.A. No. 51/1996, mislead the Tribunal and obtained the impugned order and in fact the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were granted full relief voluntarily by the employer and order was passed and communicated to respondent Nos. 2 and 3. The petitioner has placed on record the copy of that order which is dated 04.11.1996 (Annexure -6).

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner vehemently submitted that they have preferred writ petition only to show that the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 by misleading the Tribunal obtained the order even after getting full relief from the writ petitioner.