PANDIT BINODA NAND JHA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD the parties finally.

(2.) MR . Pathak, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner college deposited registration forms of 429 students in Arts course and 502 students in Science course alongwith requisite fees but Jharkhand Academic Council (JAC) has registered only 384 students of each courses; and that in 2008 -10 also surplus students were allowed registration; and that the alleged surplus students had appeared in Class 11th examination and, therefore, they are eligible to appear in 12th class examination.

(3.) IT appears from the requisition Annexure -c/1 that the petitioner itself made requisition on 27.3.2010 only for 384 students in each Arts and Science courses and 123 students in Commerce course. Accordingly, question papers and answer sheets were supplied. JAC was justified in not accepting registration beyond such requisitioned numbers of students. On the purported plea of sympathy on the surplus students, the petitioner cannot be allowed to perpetuate illegality. It is unfortunate that the petitioner, claiming itself to be an educational institute, is indulging in such illegal activity.