SAKHI DEVI Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner at length.

(2.) THE instant writ petition has been preferred for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding upon the respondents to implement the direction issued by the Ministry of Human Resource Development Department of Women and Child Development, Government of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi dated 2nd January, 1996 and two subsequent circulars dated 28th October, 1996 and 5th November, 2009.

(3.) I have perused the three circulars which is only for the limited purpose. In that case, such Anganwari Sevika intended to contest the election should not be restrained only because they are serving as Sevika, sicne it is not a permanent post and it is only honorarium that is given to him.