PAWAN ENTERPRISES Vs. BIHAR STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr. Bajla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Prabhat Kumar, learned counsel for the Board.

(2.) IN this writ application, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order, dated 19.10.2000 passed by the respondent No. 3, General Manager -cum - Chief Engineer, Jamshedpur Area Electricity Board, Jamshedpur, whereby, he has rejected the representation filed by the petitioner in pursuance of the direction given by this Court in CWJC No. 880/ 2000(R).

(3.) AS noticed above, the petitioner during inspection admitted the fact that the load found in the premises, was 103 HP. Clause 16 -9 of the Tariff provides, inter alia, that if the connected load is found more than the sanctioned load then the bill shall be raised on the basis of formula provided in the said clause. The Chief Engineer rightly held that the petitioner is liable to execute an agreement in respect of the connected load of 103 HP.