RAMDHAN MAHATO Vs. VIRGU MAHATO

JUDGEMENT

(1.) DEFENDANTS are appellants.

(2.) IN cadestral survey Khatian names of defendants ancestors were recorded as tenant in respect of Plot Nos. 323 and 343 of village Cailtartola Glidih. District Ranchi. In remarks column thereof names of Ghasi Mahto and Mochi Mahto were mentioned as Sikmidar. Mochi. Mahto was grand father of the plaintiff.

(3.) IN 1929 -30. Revisional Survey Khatian was finally published, wherein Revisional Survey Plot Nos. 610 and 658 respectively were carved out from aforesaid Cadestral Survey Plot Nos. 323 and 343 and in remarks column thereof name of Ranglal Mahto. son of Mochi Mahto (father of plaintiff. Virgu Mahto) was recorded as Dakhalkar. paying rash rent to the recorded tenant.