BASUDEO MAHTO Vs. C.C.L.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties.

(2.) THE petitioner has prayed for issuance of a writ directing the respondents to provide employment to the petitioner in terms of the provisions of Clause 9 -5 -0 of the National Coal Wage Agreement -V and also to quash and order dated 2.9.99 and 25.1.2000 whereby the authorities of the respondents declined to grant employment to the petitioner.

(3.) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner, mainly relied upon Clause 9.4.0(iii) to the Agreement while the learned Counsel for the CCL relied upon Clause 9.4.0(ii) of the said agreement. For better appreciation, the two clauses are reproduced hereinbelow :