MD. ALLAM Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD Mr. A.K, Sinha, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S.B. Gadodia, learned counsel for the respondents.

(2.) IN this writ application the petitioner has prayed for quashing the notification contained in memo No. 60 dated 21.12.2000 issued by the State Government whereby the service of the petitioner has been taken back from Mineral Area Development Authority and has been handed over to parent department with immediate effect. A copy of the said notification has been annexed as Annexure 5 to the writ application.

(3.) THE grievance of the petitioner is that without initiating any proceeding and without any rhyme and reason the said State with mala fide intention, issued the impugned notification dated 21.12 -2000 and decided to send back the petitioner to his parent department.