KASHI NATH SHARMA Vs. PRESIDING OFFICER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) IN this writ application the petitioner has challenged the award, dated 6.2.1999 passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court in Reference Case No. 6/93, whereby it was held that the termination of services of the concerned workman by way of superannuation is proper and the petitioner is not entitled to any relief.

(2.) IT appears that the Government of Bihar, Department of Labour, Employment and Training, vide notification, dated 9.7.1993 referred the following dispute to the Labour Court for jurisdiction : - - 'Whether the termination of services of Shree K.N. Sharma. Ticket No. 159863 P.No. 49901 workman. Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd., Jamshedpur is proper ? If' not whether he should be reinstated on thejob or what compensation he should be paid.'

(3.) ON the other hand, the case of the management is that the workman was absorbed in service in 1967 and at that time he did not produce any certificate or any documentary proof in support of his age. The management therefore adopted the prescribed procedure of Standing Order and the age of the petitioner was assessed by the Medical Board who assessed his age as 35 years on 3.1.1963. It is further stated that the workman was superannuated on 4.1.1988 on completion of 60 years of age. But, before that, on the request of the workman, he was allowed one year extension being found medically fit as per the Standing Order. The workman was, therefore, finally superannuated on 4.1.1989.