BADAL PRASAD Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties through V.C.

(2.) The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for following reliefs;

(3.) Sans details, the brief facts as disclosed in the writ application is that while the petitioner was posted at Dhanbad he requested the respondent-authority for leave to go home in connection with his marriage. However the same was not granted and pursuant to that it has been alleged that one Havaldar Ranjit Singh took the petitioner to the Deputy Superintendent of Police and there was some altercation between them, for which a complaint was lodged by the said Deputy Superintendent of Police Centre-II, Dhanbad and pursuant to that the petitioner was suspended and a departmental proceeding was initiated by issuing a chargesheet. Thereafter a departmental enquiry was conducted and the petitioner was held guilty and punishment of dismissal has been awarded to him. The said punishment order was upheld by the Appellate Authority as well as the Revisional Authority.