HARISH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsels for the parties.

(2.) Learned counsel for the petitioners Mr. A. K. Kashyap, Senior Advocate submits that there are three sets of cases i.e.

(3.) The learned Senior counsel for the petitioners submits that all Cr.M.P. have been filed by the accused persons under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing the 2nd FIR and similar questions are involved therefore they have been tagged together forming a batch of cases. Learned counsel also submits that so far as writ petitions being W.P. (Cr.) No. 190 of 2016, W.P. (Cr.) No. 191 of 2016 and W.P. (Cr.) No. 221 of 2016 are concerned, they have been filed by the opposite party Anti Corruption Bureau and they are also relating to the concerned cases which are involved in the Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions (Cr.M.P.) and therefore, they have also been tagged along with the criminal miscellaneous petitions to be taken up together. He submits that the writ petitions were filed for amalgamation of the cases for which Dhanbad/Dhansar P.S. case as well as Vigilance P.S. case were filed.