BALKISHUN RAM Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard through V.C.

(2.) The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioners for the following reliefs;

(3.) At the outset, Mr. Saurav Arun, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this is the third round of litigation only due to the mala-fide intention of the respondent-authorities. The petitioners moved before this Court way back in the year, 1997; which was allowed in their favor and thereafter, again in the year, 2006, they filed another writ application which was also decided in their favour, but only to frustrate the order of this court, the impugned order has been passed.