(1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties through V.C.
(2.) The instant writ application has been preferred for following relief:
(3.) From records it appears that this is the second round of litigation. The petitioner, at the initial stage, had prayed for seeking a direction upon the competent authority to appoint the 50 successful candidates who were found to be successful in the selection process, but they have not been appointed. So the petitioners being aggrieved has approached this Court by filing a writ petition being W.P.(S) No. 6719/2010 (Kanhiya Prasad @ Kanhiya Prasad Lal and Anr. Vs. Government of Jharkhand and Ors.) and analogous cases. The said writ petition was disposed of on 28.02.2012.