LAWS(JHAR)-2020-10-6

HOLIKA KUMARI RAM Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND

Decided On October 07, 2020
Holika Kumari Ram Appellant
V/S
STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the parties through V.C.

(2.) The instant application has been preferred by the petitioner for following reliefs:-

(3.) The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed on the post of Constable in Mahila Battalion of Jharkhand Armed Police (JAP-10). A departmental proceeding was initiated by framing a memo of charge against her on 22.2.2012. The charge against the petitioner is that she was having illicit relationship with one Baijyanath Sahu, husband of Uma Devi, Ashok Nagar, Ranchi who ousted his wife from matrimonial home and that Uma Devi filed a criminal case under Section 498-A and 494 of the IPC, against the said Baijyanath Sahu which was registered as Mahila P.S. Case No.24 of 2011, in which a supervision note was given by Superintendent of Police, Hatia, Ranchi which held the petitioner guilty on the ground that this petitioner, being the member of discipline force, has acted contrary to departmental discipline. On these allegations, the charge was framed against the petitioner. The petitioner submitted her reply to the memo of charge. Pursuant thereto, the enquiry report dated 15.06.2012 was submitted by the Inquiry officer holding the petitioner guilty of the charge. Thereafter, a second show cause notice was issued on 19.06.2012, which was duly replied by the petitioner on 23.06.2012. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner was inflicted the penalty of dismissal from service on 27.06.2012. The petitioner preferred an appeal before the Appellate Authority on 10.07.2012, which was rejected on 14.09.2012. The petitioner preferred memorial to the Director General of Police, Jharkhand, Ranchi on 28.09.2012. This memorial/revision was also rejected on 18.02.2013.