(1.) Heard counsel for the parties.
(2.) The petitioners in this writ application, have challenged the order of the Sub-Judge-I, Dhanbad passed in Title Suit No. 29 of 2005, whereby the learned court below had allowed the prayer of the plaintiff/respondent for appointment of Pleader Commissioner under the provisions of Order 26 Rule 9 CPC read with Section 151 CPC.
(3.) It appears that earlier, this issue was finally decided by this Court vide order dated 16.11.2005 whereby, upon hearing the counsel for the parties, this Court had set aside the order of appointment of the Pleader Commissioner.