(1.) In this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 1.7.04 passed in course of conciliation proceeding. The operative part of the impugned order reads as follows:
(2.) The grievance of the petitioner- Management is that learned Assistant Labour Commissioner has exceeded his jurisdiction in giving the said direction to the Management.
(3.) I have heard Mr. A.K. Mehta, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Management and considered the facts and the provisions of Sections 33(1) &(2) of the I.D. Act, 1947.